|
by Quin Cho In 1905, Japan and Russia signed the Treaty of Portsmouth, ending the Russo-Japanese War. Through this treaty, Japan secured effective control over Korea, as Russia relinquished its claims, and gained the Liaodong Peninsula, home to vital ports and railways. To protect these strategic assets, Japan established the “Kwantung Garrison” in 1906, comprising one infantry division and six independent railway guard battalions.[1] By 1919, the Kwantung Garrison was renamed the Kwantung Army due to an administrative restructuring that made it responsible to the Army Ministry as opposed to the civilian government. The Kwantung Army gained a significant amount of autonomy from this new arrangement and took actions it deemed necessary for the maintenance and expansion of Japan’s empire in northeastern China.[2]
0 Comments
by Kokoro Igawa Sugamo Prison was a distinct environment unlike any other—suspected and condemned Japanese war criminals were incarcerated on Japanese soil by the victorious American occupation in the postwar period. With a diverse inmate population ranging from high-profile wartime bureaucrats and politicians to their subordinate military personnel and a group of young American guards, the relationships that formed between such vastly different people serve as valuable insight into the inner workings of Sugamo Prison and the varying attitudes held by prisoners and guards alike.
by Brenden Crowson The Hoten POW Camp was unique in its demographic makeup. It housed a majority American population, totalling over a thousand people, along with approximately a hundred British prisoners and a small contingency of Australians. Not only was there diversity in nationality, but also in military units and hierarchy. While the British and Australian POWs were predominantly composed of Army personnel, the Americans consisted of personnel from the Army, Marines, Navy, and Air Force. Within this makeup was a minority contingent of officers and a much larger enlistee population from all nationalities. This diverse population of Allied POWs led to varying experiences and stories from Hoten.
by Zhenghe Qian 凡在新国家领土之内居住者,皆无种族之歧视,尊卑之分别 All who reside within the territory of the new state shall be free from racial discrimination and distinctions of rank. —满洲国政府 —Manchukuo Government Northeast China, historically known as Manchuria, has long been a multi-ethnic region. The Jurchens, who later became known as the Manchus, founded the Qing dynasty, the last feudal dynasty in Chinese history. The Qing fostered enduring ties among Manchus, Han Chinese, and Mongols, reflecting a form of Chinese cosmopolitanism that peaked during the Tang dynasty. The Japanese, heavily influenced by Tang culture, drew upon this legacy when they established the puppet state of Manchukuo following the Mukden Incident of 1931.
by Rebekah Fuller The prisoners of war (POWs) journeyed on the Tottori Maru to Manchuria—conditions aboard such vessels were undeniably hellish, giving rise to the collective term “hellships.” The POWs would arrive at the port, and the men were then separated into two groups. The first group consisted of the sick POWs who would be taken to the hospital, and the second group would be taken to the Mukden POW camp. The POWs were forced to work at various factories near the camp, regardless of the conditions. The POWs were also visited by a medical unit, which later became known as Unit 731. Some survivors have said that the forced labor was “slavery in every way.” In 2015, one of the companies that profited from the forced labor, Mitsubishi, issued an apology to the Allied POWs who endured the harsh treatment.
by Lillian Hoffer Unit 731 was one of Japan's best kept secrets: a biological and chemical warfare research facility operated by the Japanese Imperial Army during World War II in occupied Manchuria. Victims included people of many backgrounds, such as Chinese, Koreans, Soviets, and others, subjected to vivisections, frostbite tests, germ weapon trials, and altitude experiments. Despite the scale of these atrocities, many perpetrators were granted immunity in exchange for data, allowing Unit 731 to remain one of history’s most disturbing and underreported war crimes.
by Ellen Brewster POW camps were scattered over Japan and its colonies during the war. The incredible ‘Mapping POW Camps in Japan During World War II’ by War Crimes Documentation Initiative illuminates the extent of these camps. This digital resource compiles research layers to accurately pinpoint camp locations. (Seen below)[1] Whilst the mapping remains incomplete due to limited access to Japanese wartime records, efforts now focus on understanding the camps’ function and the daily lives of their prisoners. Personal testimonies after liberation and investigations made during the war shed light on the lives of the POWs and their captors.
by Irina Guo August 1945—Soviet tanks rolled into Manchuria, crushing Japan’s grip on the region. But was this a heroic liberation or a strategic power play?
The Kwantung Army had terrorized Manchuria, an area comprising three provinces (Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang) in northeast China, which had been separated from China proper by Japan’s establishment of the puppet state Manchukuo in 1932. While Chinese officials and the last Qing emperor, Puyi, nominally staffed and headed Manchukuo, no decree was issued without the guidance of Japanese advisers. The imperialist rule that had oppressed the local population since 1931 was shattered in weeks by the Soviet Red Army’s campaign, code-named “Operation August Storm.” The importance of the Soviet offensive in breaking Japanese resistance in the final days of World War II cannot be overstated, though it remains understudied. Some historians, including Charles Stephenson, argue that the Soviet attack, combined with the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, convinced much of the Japanese leadership to accept the Potsdam Proclamation. [1] The Soviet role in ending Japanese rule in Manchuria is undeniable. However, calling it a “liberation” oversimplifies the Soviet motives and methods. While local Chinese civilians welcomed and aided the Red Army in expelling the Japanese from northeast China, the Soviets’ self-serving geopolitical aims and occasional misconduct cast doubt on whether “liberation” fully captures their actions. by Antoni Staszkiewicz Brutal naval warfare, immense distances, and devastating human costs defined the Pacific theater of World War II. For the Allies, defeating Japan’s maritime capabilities was a critical step toward victory. Japanese control of vast ocean spaces and occupied territories was possible through the shipping of thousands of vessels carrying troops, resources, and prisoners of war across the Pacific. Disrupting this transport became a top Allied priority, with submarines and aircraft relentlessly targeting Japanese ships to weaken the enemy’s war machine. But in pursuing this strategy, the Allies faced a tragic and largely unavoidable consequence: in their efforts to sink Japanese ships, they often ended up killing their own men. [1]
by Kokoro Igawa Following World War II, the Allied Powers prosecuted, sentenced, and imprisoned Japanese war criminals across the Asia-Pacific. From December 1945, all Japanese war criminals incarcerated in Japan—including those repatriated thereafter—were held in Sugamo Prison (Wilson et al. 2017, 106). Sugamo thus became a central site where these individuals grappled with their responsibility for the war and shaped attitudes that influenced their reintegration into Japanese society (Wilson 2011, 173).
|